3 ms·
A note on urxvt and colors. Many distros do not compile it with 256 color support enabled by default which may be why the author had issues.
by hyperion2010 8y ago
A note on urxvt and colors. Many distros do not compile it with 256 color support enabled by default which may be why the author had issues.
- Aengeuad 8y agoThe author mentions testing the terminals on Debian as well as Fedora, and since I use urxvt on Fedora it should be fairly easy to verify the authors results. The package with colour support on Fedora is called rxvt-unicode-256color, and the binary is urxvt256c unlike some other systems where colour support may be enabled on the regular urxvt binary. Using the gist the author mentions [0] I end up getting the same results that the author gets, along with the incorrect blinking characters [1]. I even tried 'rxvt-unicode-with-perl-with-unicode3-with-plugins-9.22' from Nix, which includes colour support, to the same results. [0] https://gist.github.com/XVilka/8346728 https://gist.github.com/XVilka/8346728 [1] https://i.imgur.com/zvBp5oi.png https://i.imgur.com/zvBp5oi.png
- hyperion2010 8y agoSame results on gentoo compiled as I stated. I stand corrected.