4 ms·
What is the current relationship between Libav and FFmpeg? I could never figure out which one I should support when there was a falling out, and things might ev
by Bromskloss 9y ago
What is the current relationship between Libav and FFmpeg? I could never figure out which one I should support when there was a falling out, and things might even have changed since then.
- stirner 9y agoWhen I say libav*, I and most people mean libavformat, libavcodec, libswscale, etc.; the C libraries that form the basis of the command line tool and are widely used elsewhere. libav (no wildcard) is a fork of FFmpeg that is broadly focused on reducing bloat and cleaning up the API. As such, libav tends to add features more slowly, while FFmpeg generally follows all of libav’s new features and bug fixes as well as its own [1]. Debian was on libav for a while but went back to FFmpeg in 2015 [2]. [1] http://blog.pkh.me/p/13-the-ffmpeg-libav-situation.html http://blog.pkh.me/p/13-the-ffmpeg-libav-situation.html [2] http://news.softpedia.com/news/Debian-Moves-to-FFmpeg-and-Drops-Libav-484793.shtml http://news.softpedia.com/news/Debian-Moves-to-FFmpeg-and-Dr...
- Bromskloss 9y ago> When I say libav*, I and most people mean libavformat, libavcodec, libswscale, etc.; the C libraries that form the basis of the command line tool and are widely used elsewhere. Oh, so were those things called "libav" even before the fork, and were perhaps the origin for the name of the fork libav?
- Hello71 9y agoyes. some people (including me) would argue that they chose that name in part to cause deliberate confusion.