3 ms·
That doesn't change my view on this. You're paying Glitch _nothing_, yet are asking for 19/yr for this product. At the very least, a few users converting can ge
by Operyl 9y ago
That doesn't change my view on this. You're paying Glitch _nothing_, yet are asking for 19/yr for this product. At the very least, a few users converting can get you a quality VM from Linode or Digital Ocean. Who's currently doing backups? You? Or Glitch.
- jajoosam 9y agoThat's right, I'd definitely get a DO droplet if a few users converted, but haven't even had one conversion yet.
- anildash 9y agoGlitch wants apps like this to succeed, so will work with him to make sure everything stays running. And Glitch apps are just totally standard Node apps, so worst case he can run it anywhere else. Anything can happen, and there are no guarantees, but I wouldn’t worry about the choice of platforms as a risk. Source: I’m the CEO of Fog Creek, which makes Glitch, and we’re excited about apps like this one!
- Operyl 9y agoI suppose. I'm just a bit cynical because Glitch is full of these "apps" that feel like a train wreck waiting to happen. jajoosam has a number of services on your platform now, and it's hard to tell if it'll get any updates or support 6-9 months down the line.
- pbreit 9y agoHow about ditching the cynicism and instead praising such a neat service and the enterprising 14 year old who was able to build and rollout a plausible service?
- anildash 9y agoSure, but that’s true of apps on any platform. May be worth a try to state the same concerns about iOS or Android apps and see what the CEOs in charge of those platforms say, then make the call on which you trust.
- carussell 9y agoHow does the Glitch project-to-app mapping actually work? This is writt.glitch.me, so I'd expect it to be accessible at https://glitch.com/~writt https://glitch.com/~writt and https://glitch.com/edit/#!/writt https://glitch.com/edit/#!/writt except neither of those are up.
- GarethX 9y agoApp creators can choose to make their apps private , which prevents the source being viewed. This is why you can’t access those URLs.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- mgiannopoulos 9y ago"You're paying Glitch _nothing_, yet are asking for 19/yr for this product" He is asking for money to cover the expense of his work. That is also a cost, correct?
- Operyl 9y agoYes, I understand this very well too. But he's not passing on any of that money to Fog Creek (who are also spending money and is a cost).
- mort96 9y agoI don't see the issue. Nobody is forcing Fog Creek to make the glitch service free, that was their own choice - and as long as charging money for your glitch-based service isn't against the glitch ToS, there's no reason not to do so. Glitch' FAQ says they expect to eventually charge for a premium account with fewer resource restrictions. Glitch' business model is presumably then to get other services off the ground, make those services big enough to start earning significant money, and then have those services upgrade to a paid plan once they (hopefully) both earn enough money to afford it and are big enough to need it. From what I can see, this Writt thing is doing exactly what glitch's business model wants people to do.
- mgiannopoulos 9y agoSo any paid service should never use another service on its free tier? That’s a strange rule to abide to.