Many people believe it shouldn't be possible to be employed full time and still require food stamps -- that the minimum legal wage should be a living wage that

Many people believe it shouldn't be possible to be employed full time and still require food stamps -- that the minimum legal wage should be a living wage that covers the average price of food and rent in that area, at least. So, it follows that they would only believe it laudable to employ the poor if you're employing them to a standard that allows them to survive. The issue is that if Business A and Individual B are paying taxes, why should those taxes be used to increase Business C's profit margin by subsidizing their employees? Should this not be the responsibility of Business C?