5 ms·
> far more unfilled jobs than there are unemployed people That can't mean "unfilled jobs at market wage", because jobs at market wage get filled (that's what m
by cousin_it 9y ago
> far more unfilled jobs than there are unemployed people
That can't mean "unfilled jobs at market wage", because jobs at market wage get filled (that's what market wage means). So you're talking about unfilled jobs at below market wage. Of course there'd be tons of those posted. Not sure that comparing it to the number of unemployed people means anything.
- jon_richards 9y agoThat's only really true over long time periods. If there are 600k doctor jobs and only 500k doctors, it doesn't matter how much you pay them, you're going to have to wait around 10 years for new students to hear that wages are high and decide to study medicine instead of something else.
- Noumenon72 9y agoThat's caused by regulation. There are easily 100,000 people who studied really hard at their nursing degree or pre-med who would make fine GPs if they were allowed to try.
- simonh 9y agoSo if all the qualified people for a job are employed, and I want to employ one more, all I have to do is offer more money? All that happens then is that a suitable applicant quits their lesser paid job and takes mine, but at a market level that just shuffles the problem around. There's still an unfilled vacancy. It doesn't matter how much money you offer, the invisible hand of the market can't magically conjure up qualified experienced applicants out of thin air. This is the problem with this kind of blinkered market forces fundamentalism. The market isn't instantaneous, there isn't an endless supply of every product or service depending only on price, to fill every need. The real world is lumpy, and slow, inelastic and constrained.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]