4 ms·
It's only surprising if you ascribe monadic properties to that syntax versus understanding it as literal syntactic sugar and absolutely nothing else.
by ionforce 8y ago
It's only surprising if you ascribe monadic properties to that syntax versus understanding it as literal syntactic sugar and absolutely nothing else.
- clhodapp 8y agoI would say: it is `Set` and `List` that are wrong in that example, not `for`. That said, `for` really does have some issues (enter https://github.com/oleg-py/better-monadic-for/blob/master/README.md https://github.com/oleg-py/better-monadic-for/blob/master/RE...)