4 ms·
I know people like to jump on the 37signals guys, but I don't feel this article is a criticism of founders or investors who choose to sell or be acquired. It's
by ajg1977 16y ago
I know people like to jump on the 37signals guys, but I don't feel this article is a criticism of founders or investors who choose to sell or be acquired.
It's a footnote reminder that acquisitions, no matter how well intentioned or promising, often result in promising products gradually being starved of attention and resources as the fickle nature of the acquirer shifts to other matters. Condolences to the users as the product is left to wither in "maintenance mode", or mothballed entirely with the sourcecode & IP archived in a drawer somewhere.
It's interesting to contemplate what the del.icio.us and Lala's of the world may have become had they been able to go it alone, and conversely what would have happened to the Facebook or Twitter's had they been acquired in the first few years.
- danilocampos 16y agoVery interesting – that is a conversation worth having. The trouble with 37signals and posts like this is their tone. It's shrill, nose held aloft, almost scoldy. It's guaranteed to polarize. I'm sure it's great for traffic, and thus builds their brand, but it doesn't generate the constructive conversation it could. edit: What's more, come on, "condolence?" Selling a business you built from the ground up is a career-defining move.