6 ms·

Hmm. I just searched for it. 46,100 hits. Not a UITableView within sight. Are you sure you didn't mistype? If I type in USTableView, it shows me two UITable

by studer 16y ago

Hmm. I just searched for it. 46,100 hits. Not a UITableView within sight. Are you sure you didn't mistype? If I type in USTableView, it shows me two UITableView hits at the top, before the exact matches.

danilocampos 16y ago
It was a specific phrase where it did this, because I tried again with just NSTableView and it was cool. I wish I could remember what was giving me trouble so I could search for it again.
- pragmatic 16y ago
  Check your search history: http://www.google.com/history/ http://www.google.com/history/
  - danilocampos 16y ago
    Search history is one of Google's creepier features – I disabled it awhile ago. Not that I suspect it helps anything, but at least if someone finds my computer or something, that data isn't two clicks away.
    - gaius 16y ago
      It's creepier than you think - ever since it began making suggestions, long before Google Instant, Google has been quietly logging things you didn't search for.
    - EricBurnett 16y ago
      FYI, search history is one of the parts of the account you have to put your password in again to view. So it should be safe from prying eyes.
      - jacquesm 16y ago
        Prying eyes on your side of the connection you mean.
        moultano 16y ago
        https://www.google.com/
        jacquesm 16y ago
        Which terminates on the other side where everything is plaintext again. https is a transport level protocol, so it protects you from people (trivially) snooping on your data in transit but anybody at google with enough clearance has access to that data.
        moultano 16y ago
        If that's what you are worried about then it seems like you'd have trouble using the internet in general.
        jacquesm 16y ago
        I'm not worried, it's just that the gggp of this comment mentioned that search history is protected by a password and so it 'should be safe from prying eyes.' All I did was point out that that data is stored on a server somewhere else and that there are lots of eyes that could be prying there. I'm sure that there are plenty of people that are concerned about their internet use being monitored, for instance, dissidents and other people that have legitimate reasons to be afraid of having their search history lifted in the future. Interesting reading on the subject of subpoenas of search records: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5165854 http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5165854 The less information that is being held on you by third parties the less chance that one day you'll be part of some drag-net operation.
        16y ago

by studer 16y ago

danilocampos 16y ago

It was a specific phrase where it did this, because I tried again with just NSTableView and it was cool. I wish I could remember what was giving me trouble so I could search for it again.

pragmatic 16y ago
Check your search history: http://www.google.com/history/ http://www.google.com/history/
- danilocampos 16y ago
  Search history is one of Google's creepier features – I disabled it awhile ago. Not that I suspect it helps anything, but at least if someone finds my computer or something, that data isn't two clicks away.
  - gaius 16y ago
    It's creepier than you think - ever since it began making suggestions, long before Google Instant, Google has been quietly logging things you didn't search for.
  - EricBurnett 16y ago
    FYI, search history is one of the parts of the account you have to put your password in again to view. So it should be safe from prying eyes.
    - jacquesm 16y ago
      Prying eyes on your side of the connection you mean.
      - moultano 16y ago
        https://www.google.com/
        jacquesm 16y ago
        Which terminates on the other side where everything is plaintext again. https is a transport level protocol, so it protects you from people (trivially) snooping on your data in transit but anybody at google with enough clearance has access to that data.
        moultano 16y ago
        If that's what you are worried about then it seems like you'd have trouble using the internet in general.
        jacquesm 16y ago
        I'm not worried, it's just that the gggp of this comment mentioned that search history is protected by a password and so it 'should be safe from prying eyes.' All I did was point out that that data is stored on a server somewhere else and that there are lots of eyes that could be prying there. I'm sure that there are plenty of people that are concerned about their internet use being monitored, for instance, dissidents and other people that have legitimate reasons to be afraid of having their search history lifted in the future. Interesting reading on the subject of subpoenas of search records: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5165854 http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5165854 The less information that is being held on you by third parties the less chance that one day you'll be part of some drag-net operation.
        16y ago