2 ms·
Look at that actual article, reporting, and data it is based upon. Try working with some older people. My last corporate team -- one of the most senior and ad
by pasbesoin 9y ago
Look at that actual article, reporting, and data it is based upon.
Try working with some older people. My last corporate team -- one of the most senior and advanced in a major corporation, and carrying some of the most critical work -- was more than 50% "older developers".
Best team I worked on. Most competent. Least bullshit. "Get 'er done" -- and don't unduly fuck over the future while you're at it.
Meanwhile, another part of the corporation was busy off-shoring as much as they could to lower cost developers in India. You'd spend months in meetings and one-on-one training, and they still wouldn't get it. And these were -- a bit different than the norm -- direct employees, not contractors. Mostly in their 20's and 30's.
I'm not saying there aren't good, competent people in India -- or from India, or whatever.
I'm saying that these "employment transition" actions aren't about that. "Better" employees.
It's not the competence -- nor the flexibility and learning; my team was doing both all the time.
It's the money.