3 ms·
That doesn’t prove ageism, it proves that IBM (and apparently the market) thought those specific individuals were overpaid for their skill sets. Sounds like ki
by djrogers 9y ago
That doesn’t prove ageism, it proves that IBM (and apparently the market) thought those specific individuals were overpaid for their skill sets.
Sounds like kind of a crappy move, but it doesn’t prove ageism.
- dsr_ 9y agoIs there a difference between losing your job because of ageism and losing your job because the company thinks they can get the job done for less money? Is it still a difference when the functional effect is that workers over 45 are the primary target?