>He didn't suggested banning, he suggested controlling them which is extremely different. And which is the next step for someone who does want to ban it. At l

>He didn't suggested banning, he suggested controlling them which is extremely different. And which is the next step for someone who does want to ban it. At least in the US the discussion has reached the point where one side no longer trusts the intentions of the other side, so anything that could eventually help a ban (such as a registry) is seem as being for the purpose of eventually helping a ban. This isn't without reason either, given that many past compromises are now seen as not enough and begun being presented as errors in previous laws that need to be fixed.