> And, we don't need yet another tax on the most value-bearing (and typically philanthropic) people in society Presuming you're talking about value-bearing in

> And, we don't need yet another tax on the most value-bearing (and typically philanthropic) people in society Presuming you're talking about value-bearing in terms of job creation, this statement is tautological. In a society where a handful of people own the vast majority of the wealth, of course they're also the most value-bearing and philanthropic: they're the only ones who can be!