That sounds like a GPL loophole to me. It would be much easier to extend and replace if someone could turn off the condition " You must cause any work that you

That sounds like a GPL loophole to me. It would be much easier to extend and replace if someone could turn off the condition " You must cause any work that you distribute or publish, that in whole or in part contains or is derived from the Program or any part thereof, to be licensed as a whole at no charge to all third parties under the terms of this License." [0] I'm all for making these easier to read, but they shouldn't be line-item veto. [0]http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.html http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.html