3 ms·

So because some licenses don't have ongoing re-certification requirements, that means all license are bad? Couldn't it just be that a "programming license" has

So because some licenses don't have ongoing re-certification requirements, that means all license are bad? Couldn't it just be that a "programming license" has regular testing and re-certification? Because a license/certification test is the exact definition of "skills/competency assessment". If the licensing test doesn't meet those needs, that's not the fault of licenses in general, that's a fault in the test and can be fixed.

vonmoltke 9y ago
> So because some licenses don't have ongoing re-certification requirements, that means all license are bad? That is not at all what I said. I was addressing how licensure does very little to prove competence for the three trades specified in the post. > Couldn't it just be that a "programming license" has regular testing and re-certification? How many licenses require recertification? Why do you think a programming one would? Continuing education requirements do not count for this, as they are mere completion measures. > Because a license/certification test is the exact definition of "skills/competency assessment". Yes, and this test needs to be passed once. The longer ago it was, the less it says about the person now.
- freehunter 9y ago
  >Why do you think a programming one would? Because it doesn’t exist yet, and my hypothetical is just as good as yours.