Wtf. And why even include the name in the first place? Literally no good would have come from that in a story like this. If you must refer to a name use a pseud

Wtf. And why even include the name in the first place? Literally no good would have come from that in a story like this. If you must refer to a name use a pseudonym. This really subtly shows one of the darkest sides of journalism, especially considering it's coming from the WSJ. The engagement of the audience and ad revenue is so important that protecting sources and journalistic integrity is so easily forgotten by the author and editors.