No, that's what happened when you disconnect medical science from law and instead use culture and moral as legal basis. There is no good decision here, the alt

No, that's what happened when you disconnect medical science from law and instead use culture and moral as legal basis. There is no good decision here, the alternative, refusing on medical ground is not correct either. There is no medical ground to refuse the guy some weed, when it is perfectly legal for him to buy unlimited quantities of alcohol which, medically, is as bad or worse. In both cases, the law puts the doctor in a position where he needs to bullshit. Some will chose to ignore the global context and look at the patient request in isolation, other will do the opposite. edit: also "pain" is intrinsically difficult metric for a doctor.