2 ms·
I preferred Nitro over Rails when they both arrived in 2004. Nitro made it far easier to evolve an application from a single static HTML file to any degree of
by jamesbritt 16y ago
I preferred Nitro over Rails when they both arrived in 2004. Nitro made it far easier to evolve an application from a single static HTML file to any degree of complexity (plus it was faster, thread safe, and more modular). Rails seemed better suited to a very specific genre of application. Great when you're building that app; less so when you needed to color outside the lines.
Ramaze picked up where Nitro left. All software is opinionated; I prefer the opinions built into Ramaze. Whatever tool you pick, whatever language you use, make sure the opinions it embodies align with yours, or you'll find yourself frustrated way too often.
But I really think the alleged hating on Rails has more to do with how some people perceive its more vocal proponents. Sadly, it all feels like being back in high school again. It's the "rock star" and "hero" nonsense that grates.
People would do better to scope out the various languages and tools, learn to appreciate the good stuff, steal the better ideas for their own preferences, and ignore the personalities and drama.
Code talks, bullshit walks.