Nobody noticed that 16:9 and 16:10 it's a lossy approximation to the golden ratio (1,777 and 1,6 vs 1,618)? Also, the 21:9 (2,333) it's a lossy approximation

Nobody noticed that 16:9 and 16:10 it's a lossy approximation to the golden ratio (1,777 and 1,6 vs 1,618)? Also, the 21:9 (2,333) it's a lossy approximation to the silver ratio (2,414). But probably nobody knows that 4:3 (1,333) it's a lossy approximation to the Córdoba ratio (1,306). Yes, the most popular screen sizes approximate to the most beauty rectangle proportions. * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_ratio https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_ratio * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silver_ratio https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silver_ratio * https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rect%C3%A1ngulo_cordob%C3%A9s https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rect%C3%A1ngulo_cordob%C3%A9s (Spanish)