>At least Twitter has a larger pool of "talent" to start with, but it still doesn't make "curation" any easier and most users* would probably concede it's a mas

>At least Twitter has a larger pool of "talent" to start with, but it still doesn't make "curation" any easier and most users* would probably concede it's a massive waste of time. I know it's not optimal because Twitter neglects it, but I find the lists feature to be useful enough for curation. I follow quite a few accounts on separate lists that I wouldn't want to follow all the time in my main feed.