4 ms·
Since it's AGPL, why not call it Free Software instead of Open Source. https://github.com/ssbc/patchwork/blob/master/LICENSE https://github.com/ssbc/patchwork/b
by profalseidol 8y ago
Since it's AGPL, why not call it Free Software instead of Open Source.
https://github.com/ssbc/patchwork/blob/master/LICENSE https://github.com/ssbc/patchwork/blob/master/LICENSE
- no_u 8y agoWhat's the difference? I've been calling my AGPL and MIT licensed projects as free and open source.
- carapace 8y ago"Why Open Source misses the point of Free Software" by Richard Stallman https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point....
- no_u 8y agoVisible source proprietary code is not libre and not necessarily free. Potayto potahto.
- profalseidol 8y agohttps://github.com/ssbc/patchwork/blob/master/LICENSE https://github.com/ssbc/patchwork/blob/master/LICENSE