5 ms·
Bitcoin does not preclude the use of the legal system or other channels of recourse.
by TTPrograms 8y ago
Bitcoin does not preclude the use of the legal system or other channels of recourse.
- garmaine 8y agoLegal system can’t force a bitcoin transfer. (Not relevant to TFA though.)
- mieseratte 8y agoBut it can lock your ass in a cage for contempt. The law doesn't work like code. You don't get to go "Ha! I found a loophole if you read this in the strictest, most literal sense!" You get a human who will read right past your bullshit and nail you to the cross.
- garmaine 8y agoIf the keys are gone, the keys are gone. “I’m afraid I just don’t recall my recovery phrase, senator.”
- vageli 8y ago"I'm afraid I don't recall where I buried the money from the robbery, your honor." Somehow I think courts have dealt with this type of thing in the past.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- garmaine 8y agoyes, they have: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fifth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fifth_Amendment_to_the_United_...
- DanBC 8y agoThat just means you get jailed for contempt until you can persuade them that you actually can't remember the keys, and that you're not just trying to ignore the court order. That could be some years. http://abcnews.go.com/2020/story?id=8101209&page=1 http://abcnews.go.com/2020/story?id=8101209&page=1 > A 73-year-old Philadelphia lawyer walked out of prison July 10 after serving 14 years for contempt of court -- the longest term ever served for contempt. > In a divorce proceeding in 1995 H. Beatty Chadwick said that he had lost his fortune of about $2.75 million and so could not make a significant financial settlement with soon-to-be ex-wife Bobbie.
- Spooky23 8y agoJudge: “No problem, we take cash.”
- greenshackle2 8y agoI guess you'll be paying in cash then!
- mindslight 8y agoThis is frequently repeated. But it doesn't really describe how law works, but how courts work. There are plenty of powerful people who get off via such "loopholes", and plenty of powerless who get nailed up even though they are standing on straightforward legal reasoning.
- mieseratte 8y agoThat's a pretty fair clarification. So long as you have a good enough lawyer, and a jury trial you could possibly get off on anything.
- ckocagil 8y agoWhy not?
- madeofpalk 8y agoIf I understand correctly, the legal system can’t force any kind of transfer. It can, however, apply penalties for not doing what it says.
- tialaramex 8y agoThe court has a remedy called "specific performance" at its disposal. If my problem is that you took my dog, the court absolutely can say "give back tialaramex's dog". Now, there's a philosophical sense in which this doesn't force you to actually give back my dog. But you could say that about all court remedies. I recommend just giving back the dog.