3 ms·
I get your point I truly do. But a nefarious state (fascist, communist, dictatorial) will always use ‘safety’, ‘security’ as a concern and an argument to block
by novalis78 9y ago
I get your point I truly do. But a nefarious state (fascist, communist, dictatorial) will always use ‘safety’, ‘security’ as a concern and an argument to block and jail.
- FireBeyond 9y agoI don't think the motives are ulterior. After all, Spacelink, with 4,000+ satellites, was approved recently, too. It's all about trackability.
- vatueil 9y ago> But a nefarious state (fascist, communist, dictatorial) will always use ‘safety’, ‘security’ as a concern and an argument to block and jail. So what? Are there not valid reasons to bring up "safety" and "security"? Unless you're claiming we're dealing with a "nefarious state", this statement doesn't carry any weight. For that matter even nefarious states may have valid safety concerns, including preventing orbital debris.