3 ms·
Is anyone surprised a startup ignored the ruling of a regulatory body and did what they wanted anyways?
by dswiese 8y ago
Is anyone surprised a startup ignored the ruling of a regulatory body and did what they wanted anyways?
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- reaperducer 8y agoBut... but... but... being "disruptive" is a good thing! Move fast and break [laws]. It's the SV way.
- mfoy_ 8y ago"Move fast and break things" is a problematic motto if it applies equally to your product and work culture.
- chasing 8y agoAnd to the health and safety of those around you...
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- PhasmaFelis 8y agoIt's a problem if your product is anything that actually matters. (Which is why several medical start-ups have wound up neck deep in shit in the last few years.)
- stcredzero 8y agoMove Fast and Start a Kessler Syndrome Cascade?
- ixtli 8y agoMove fast and break other people's safety.
- bigiain 8y ago"Uber, but for space trash!" (A herd of 2nd tier VC's are now breaking FCC laws throwing money at orbital velocities vaguely in the direction of some random Starbucks in SOMA...)
- Bizarro 8y agoChallenging power that might or might not be legitimate or have jurisdiction is prudent and responsible. Claiming random regulatory body has a "ruling" just because some guys typed something into a document isn't responsible.