2 ms·
For me, desktop 21:9 displays have been a good substitute -- divide the screen down the middle and it's comparable in feel to having side-by-side 4:3 displays.
by tbyehl 9y ago
For me, desktop 21:9 displays have been a good substitute -- divide the screen down the middle and it's comparable in feel to having side-by-side 4:3 displays.
- Zardoz84 9y agoI have one on my house computer. Really nice, but I found that for doing productive stuff, having two screens (16:9 + 4:3 or 16:9 + 16:9) it's better. Yes, you can use the 21:9 as virtually two 4:3 screens, but it's the same. They way that you have tendency to place and snap windows isn't the same that when you have a true multi monitor setup.
- tbyehl 9y agoMy desktop runs a pair of stacked 21:9 displays just fine ;-) I'm in the camp that finds 16:9 / 16:10 to be the wrong ratio for... everything. Maybe a giant high-DPI display would make it better. For now, having four windows arranged as though they were maximized on a 2x2 grid of 4:3-ish displays perfect suits how I like to work.