5 ms·
would you be willing to pay for a proxy service that took a url that used non-free JS and rendered it to pure dom that you could then view without JS ? any sen
by nqzero 8y ago
would you be willing to pay for a proxy service that took a url that used non-free JS and rendered it to pure dom that you could then view without JS ?
any sense of whether other people that care about such things would be willing to pay ?
- softawre 8y agoisn't that close to what Reader Mode does?
- kukabynd 8y agoThese questions don’t work. http://momtestbook.com http://momtestbook.com
- hjek 8y agoInteresting idea, but I don't think anyone would pay for it. From a freedom perspective it would probably be considered SaaSS[0]. You could use wkhtmltopdf[1] for a service like that. [0]: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/who-does-that-server-really-serve.html https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/who-does-that-server-really-s... [1]: https://wkhtmltopdf.org/ https://wkhtmltopdf.org/