5 ms·

Is it possible to get a HTML or plaintext version for people who don't just run any non-free JS[1]? [1]: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/javascript-trap.html ht

• LinuxBender 9y ago
  I would also like a text or plain html version of the list.
• nqzero 9y ago
  would you be willing to pay for a proxy service that took a url that used non-free JS and rendered it to pure dom that you could then view without JS ? any sense of whether other people that care about such things would be willing to pay ?
  • softawre 9y ago
    isn't that close to what Reader Mode does?
  • kukabynd 9y ago
    These questions don’t work. http://momtestbook.com http://momtestbook.com
  • hjek 8y ago
    Interesting idea, but I don't think anyone would pay for it. From a freedom perspective it would probably be considered SaaSS[0]. You could use wkhtmltopdf[1] for a service like that. [0]: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/who-does-that-server-really-serve.html https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/who-does-that-server-really-s... [1]: https://wkhtmltopdf.org/ https://wkhtmltopdf.org/
• danShumway 9y ago
  Why not, I've been meaning to work on my vim macros. https://gist.github.com/danShumway/2c4cc6916ff8ed4d941ec64b55b2e850 https://gist.github.com/danShumway/2c4cc6916ff8ed4d941ec64b5... No guarantee that this is up to date[1] (or even error free). I realize that Github Gists are also not Open Source, but they render without Javascript enabled, and Simplenote was acting up for me and wouldn't let me publish. [1]: Last updated April 19th, 11:50 EDT
  • hjek 8y ago
    Thanks. (Viewable without non-free JS is fine)