3 ms·
I guess it boils down to that - it was built primarily as a vehicle for transferring money in various directions. Not to cost-effectively project military power
by berg01 8y ago
I guess it boils down to that - it was built primarily as a vehicle for transferring money in various directions. Not to cost-effectively project military power.
The Schadenfreude part of me is having lots of fun reading reports of the Norwegians' F-35 misadventures though!