Related: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1671581 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1671581 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1673302 http://news.ycomb

Related: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1671581 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1671581 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1673302 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1673302 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1673391 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1673391 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1674049 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1674049 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1675135 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1675135 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1677458 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1677458 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1684492 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1684492 http://searchyc.com/submissions/dance?sort=by_date http://searchyc.com/submissions/dance?sort=by_date An interesting (to me) side-effect of searching for duplications I think I've seen but can't immediately recall is that the search occasionally throws up something more interesting than I expected. Here's a case in point: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1394623 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1394623 Algorithm X has turned out to be exactly what I needed today, and I found it because I was looking for duplicationsof something entirely different. Happens more often than I would've said had I been asked.