3 ms·
I agree with you that someone's consensual sexual past shouldn't matter. But this is not someone's sexual past, it is assault on another human being, and yes,
by outside2344 8y ago
I agree with you that someone's consensual sexual past shouldn't matter.
But this is not someone's sexual past, it is assault on another human being, and yes, criminal records should matter.
- arkades 8y agoThe problem with that being that many states have been expanding their definition of “sex offender” in a harsh-on-crime theme that, over the years, has morphed it into something unintuitive. When you tell me someone is a sex offender, I think they’ve committed a crime against another human being and should be treated accordingly. I don’t think “this person got caught taking a piss in the woods off the side of the highway” (which, in fairness, is why NYS only requires level 1 - low risk, nonviolent, non predatory - offenders to register for 20 years rather than for life - wouldn’t want to be cruel and hound a public urinator for More than two decades).