11 ms·
This is extremely disingenuous. We have brains (at least, I like to think most of us do) which are capable of many, many times the amount of processing power w
by audionemesis 8y ago
This is extremely disingenuous.
We have brains (at least, I like to think most of us do) which are capable of many, many times the amount of processing power which currently exists in AP2 and AP2.5 cars. Elon himself has mentioned this delta in processing power on at least one occasion, which is why AP2.5 is even a thing.
Simply stating that "humans use eyes to drive, so car can use cameras to drive!" is foolish.
(For those who don't know - AP2.5 is the current hardware suite on Tesla's which, among some other smaller upgrades, doubled the processing power of AP2 cars. AP2.5 has two NVIDIA PX2 units as opposed to AP2's one)
- dingo_bat 8y ago> We have brains (at least, I like to think most of us do) which are capable of many, many times the amount of processing power which currently exists in AP2 and AP2.5 cars. I think it's just a matter of writing the correct software. Our brain seems really underpowered to me. And considering what even insects can do with highly limited brainpower, I think the hardware is good enough. All the gains need to come from software now.