3 ms·
Thank you for your in-depth comment. I did not mean to imply starting immediately with ”Against Method”, what I meant is that after exploring Kuhn and Popper by
by igravious 9y ago
Thank you for your in-depth comment. I did not mean to imply starting immediately with ”Against Method”, what I meant is that after exploring Kuhn and Popper by all means move onto Feyerabend.
I do appreciate your suggesting Lakatos. I was under the impression that one had to read Feyerabend first, then Lakatos. The work by Lakatos I have made note of that came up in my travels is “The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes: Philosophical Papers”. Would you be able to recommend that text as well or are you sticking to the ones you have suggested?
If I had to pick one I think you are saying to go with “For and Against Method[…]”† because it contains both sides of the coin. Thank you Oh random internet person for such helpful advice!
† http://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/F/bo3629717.html http://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/F/bo3629717...