3 ms·
I think it's interesting that the consensus here is that you can't do quality in an hour. It's been forever since I blogged, but when I did I always had that b
by Steeeve 8y ago
I think it's interesting that the consensus here is that you can't do quality in an hour.
It's been forever since I blogged, but when I did I always had that block in the back of my mind that I shouldn't publish unless it was well thought out/well written/reviewed into the ground.
But this is a twitter world. People don't spend any time reading and they don't care to retain most material. If you blog, the most important thing is having a regular schedule. People won't come back for one well written article a month. But they'll read regularly if you produce content twice a day even if they aren't particularly interested in half of what you write.
I don't think the ROI value really exists for blogging unless it's an investment in name recognition for an individual in a niche market. It's too much effort for too little reward.
- CM30 8y agoHonestly, the sad truth about the world post social media is that most people don't read past the title/thumbnail image. In a lot of cases, you could probably just write a title and neat meta description then stick a thumbnail on it, and if it was 'interesting' enough watch it get a few hundred/thousand shares. If they do get past the title, then in about 99.999% of cases, they sure as hell won't care how well written the actual content is so long as they find the subject interesting and they agree with the conclusions. It's especially true of the news world, where 'get anything out the door as long as its trending' seems to be the only way to get popularity.