4 ms·
Certainly one number is vaguely ridiculous (yet effective for the original purpose), but you are conflating learned models (which are content), as opposed to ca
by ci5er 9y ago
Certainly one number is vaguely ridiculous (yet effective for the original purpose), but you are conflating learned models (which are content), as opposed to capacity (such as raw short term memory).
- tomxor 9y ago> you are conflating learned models (which are content), as opposed to capacity (such as raw short term memory). There is no correct definition, however most people agree that intelligence is more than innate ability. If you are focusing on the later as a definition then you can indeed measure it, but consider that there are many people with an IQ as high as Einstien's, but no such deep understanding in quantum mechanics or even any subject. I would argue that casting out "learned" as something superficial is incorrect, learning is not simply acquisition of knowledge (as education systems have very slowly begun to understand since the mid 20th century)
- ci5er 9y agoHmmm. Yes to your P1 and maybe to your P2.