> It was a decision done by Apple, Oracle did not move a finger. That's not true. If you read the text, the request comes from Oracle's lawyers. "our client's

> It was a decision done by Apple, Oracle did not move a finger. That's not true. If you read the text, the request comes from Oracle's lawyers. "our client's intellectual property": > "As you are likely aware, Oracle owns US Trademark Registration No. 2416017 for JAVASCRIPT. The seller of this iTunes app prominently displays JAVASCRIPT without authorization from our client. The unauthorized display of our client's intellectual property is likely to cause consumers encountering this app to mistakenly believe that it emanates from, or is provided under a license from, Oracle. Use of our client's trademark in such a manner constitutes trademark infringement in violation of the Lanham Act. 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a)(1)(A). In order to prevent further consumer confusion and infringement of our client's intellectual property rights, we request that you immediately disable access to this app. We look forward to your confirmation that you have complied with this request."