3 ms·
In my impression, a larger share of friendships than ever are not made face to face. In my experience, they can survive as long as any other. My main question
by rhn_mk1 9y ago
In my impression, a larger share of friendships than ever are not made face to face. In my experience, they can survive as long as any other.
My main question while reading the article was: does the same effect hold for "remote" friendships? Are the same patterns visible? Or perhaps a different set of shared properties appears?
The article only mentions that a description is different than a conversation:
> Dr. Ochsner offered his own story as evidence of the primacy of chemistry over mere biography. “My wife-to-be and I were both neuroscientists in the field, we were on dating websites, but we were never matched up,” he said.
> “Then we happened to meet as colleagues and in two minutes we knew we had the kind of chemistry that breeds a relationship.”
I wonder if "chemistry" travels across the net.
Then again, I know a couple of people that are just so different to be around in meatspace than online.
- CapsAdmin 9y ago> I wonder if "chemistry" travels across the net. I guess it does to some extent but if you only have communication by text to go by it can be tricky or very different. I've met many of my online friends in real life and it's surprising how different they seem from what my expectations are. There's still that "chemistry" but initially there's a lot of new things about them that I never considered before I have to process. It always changes how I see my online friends after I meet them. It's never been a bad thing though. I feel it's the same vice versa (real life to internet). It feels a bit like 2 separate but oddly similar people I have to learn to associate with 1 person.