3 ms·
To what extent is this compatible with all existing libraries for allegedly supported languages? I'm also curious if .net standard/c# support is being planned.
by polskibus 9y ago
To what extent is this compatible with all existing libraries for allegedly supported languages?
I'm also curious if .net standard/c# support is being planned.
- gcommer 9y agoI tested it out with some fairly dependency-heavy node JS projects and it worked great (albeit with a human-noticeable perf difference vs node). R projects suffer the usual R-on-JVM issues, see eg https://github.com/oracle/fastr#status-and-limitations https://github.com/oracle/fastr#status-and-limitations . I could, however, use ggplot2 and dplyr, which I don't recall working the last time I tried R-on-JVM. So that's awesome. Being able to reasonably use R stuff from clojure (and other languages better for general purpose programming) is my data science dream. Though I can't say I'm sad with my current unix-y solutions.
- grashalm 9y agoYou can check libraries here: http://www.graalvm.org/docs/reference-manual/compatibility/ http://www.graalvm.org/docs/reference-manual/compatibility/ We don't test all of them but many. We have considered .NET support but we are not actively working on it right now. But GraalVM is an open platform. Everyone can develop a language for it: http://www.graalvm.org/docs/graalvm-as-a-platform/ http://www.graalvm.org/docs/graalvm-as-a-platform/
- bitmapbrother 9y agoIt would be hilarious to discover if C# runs better on the JVM then CLR.