3 ms·

This seems to be very interesting from a technical perspective, but it seems that it would not improve upon the accuracy of current tools and would be additive

This seems to be very interesting from a technical perspective, but it seems that it would not improve upon the accuracy of current tools and would be additive to cost, if only incrementally so. Thus the real world benefits would be reducing time spent reviewing slides or other workflow improvements?

nickparker 9y ago
Layperson speaking, but I believe skilled labor is most of the cost of these diagnostics. Even if the scope is $100k, the doctor is $200k/yr so it'd make sense for this to be a cost reducing tool if it increases speed.