Yeah from the article: > IDx-DR founder Michael Abràmoff told Science News. “It makes the clinical decision on its own.” But I would guess a specialist would

Yeah from the article: > IDx-DR founder Michael Abràmoff told Science News. “It makes the clinical decision on its own.” But I would guess a specialist would still need to be involved since it's not a fool-proof system. A specialist might take other symptoms or variables into account when making the diagnosis or order further tests. While this tool might be useful for blanket screening considering that it is harmless, it seems like it's hardly going to be "making the decision on its own" and prescribing treatment.