3 ms·

Meanwhile, The Linux Foundation decided that Linux isn't suitable and developed Zephyr [1] instead for IoT. [1] https://www.zephyrproject.org/ https://www.zeph

• igravious 8y ago
  Oh. Ha, wow. This is too delicious. Who would ever have thought that Microsoft, the great enemy of Linux, would release a product based around a Microsoft branded Linux kernel? Not I for one. Though having said that they have been increasingly opening up and making non-threatening noises towards open source of late. So, it's not _that_ much of a shock but it's still a shock! Microsoft is using Linux for IOT embedded devices, wow. And then you point out that simultaneously the Linux Foundation, the Linux Foundation, is supporting a non-Linux kernel real-time OS for IOT embedded devices. You could not make this stuff up.
• choudanu4 8y ago
  But I was under the impression that Linux isn't suitable as a real-time operating system (RTOS)[1] (which Microsoft may very well not require for their IoT systems). So the Linux Foundation providing an alternative free kernel meeting RTOS requirements makes perfect sense. I'm not as clear on the history, but was Linux ever pitched as capable of being real-time OS? I don't think so. The hard requirements for real-time generally lead to very different systems than general-purpose operating systems. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Real-time_operating_system https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Real-time_operating_system