4 ms·
I've given you an upvote, as that does seem to make sense. But to confirm, the particular quote from the BMJV that I was going by on that page is this one, doe
by SyneRyder 9y ago
I've given you an upvote, as that does seem to make sense.
But to confirm, the particular quote from the BMJV that I was going by on that page is this one, does it match with your understanding? (My German comprehension isn't great.)
"Die Anbieterkennzeichnungspflicht muss praktisch von jedem, der ein Online-Angebot bereithält, erfüllt werden. Etwas anderes gilt nur bei Angeboten, die ausschließlich privaten oder familiären Zwecken dienen und die keine Auswirkung auf den Markt haben. Im Zweifel sollten Sie davon ausgehen, dass die Anbieterkennzeichnungspflicht besteht."
The first sentence seemed to say that "in practice everyone offering something online must comply", and I took "privaten" in the second sentence to imply private as in "password protected / not publicly accessible". But as someone learning German I've probably interpreted those too narrowly, and I'd love to be corrected on the nuance!
- blattimwind 9y ago> die ausschließlich privaten oder familiären Zwecken dienen und die keine Auswirkung auf den Markt haben which exclusively cater to private/family needs/affairs and [thus] have no impact on the markets. > I took "privaten" in the second sentence to imply private as in "password protected / not publicly accessible". No, privaten Zwecken here refers to personal affairs.