> But lots of things are legal or not based on what typical people would do or think. Good thing computers use unambiguous protocols to communicate explicit in

> But lots of things are legal or not based on what typical people would do or think. Good thing computers use unambiguous protocols to communicate explicit intent. > If you asked your mom, [...] That's what defines what is legal or not in this context. I'm really terrified of a world where the law is made by asking laypeople what they think. Just like we don't define borders by asking random strangers on the street where countries are, I don't see how it's a good idea to define laws for technical services and protocols by asking people who barely understand computers what they think.