3 ms·
Yes, which is way higher than I'd expect, given SF's general opposition to high-rises. According to Google, the actual limit is 40 feet. Example article I foun
by Zarel 9y ago
Yes, which is way higher than I'd expect, given SF's general opposition to high-rises. According to Google, the actual limit is 40 feet.
Example article I found: https://recklesslyoptimistic.com/san-franciscos-height-restrictions-and-the-city-s-dark-future-c7796fafb07c https://recklesslyoptimistic.com/san-franciscos-height-restr...
- jandrese 9y agoYeah, if the limit were 500 feet you wouldn't have builders constantly complaining about it.
- darkerside 9y agoHere's another article cutting a height restriction near 500 feet. http://www.structuremag.org/?p=11635 http://www.structuremag.org/?p=11635 There are probably more height restrictions in different areas, and a 500 foot limit is actually quite restrictive. It would have prevented Salesforce Tower. The Empire State Building is over 100 floors.