4 ms·

Sorry- I edited. What I’m saying is that the server represents its owner, so when the server grants someone access in normal operation it’s not intrusion.

• harryh 8y ago
  Servers don't grant access. People grant access. People can make mistakes and set up servers to mistakenly allow access to things. Making a mistake doesn't revoke someone's property rights.
  • fenomas 8y ago
    > Making a mistake doesn't revoke someone's property rights. This is a non-sequitur, nobody is saying anything about anyone's property rights being revoked. The teen asked for access, and the content owners, via the permissions they had configured, granted it. Sure they can later decide that this was a mistake, but that doesn't make it theft for the teen to have asked for access.
    • harryh 8y ago
      Making a mistake doesn't revoke someone's property rights. They made a mistake when configuring their web server. It's obvious that this was a mistake because some of the documents contained private information from Canadian citizens.
      • fenomas 8y ago
        > They made a mistake when configuring their web server. It's obvious that this was a mistake because some of the documents contained private information from Canadian citizens. Per the tech article, it was an open archive of public documents that the government published periodically. The reasonable assumption is that the files were all public, and there's no reason to suspect the teenager in this case thought otherwise. The fact that ~3% of the files weren't properly redacted (whatever that means) is hardly "obvious". > Making a mistake doesn't revoke someone's property rights. Let's keep things constructive please.