Poor people die earlier. More importantly though their quality of life sucks, especially in a country with tens of millions without health insurance. They may h

Poor people die earlier. More importantly though their quality of life sucks, especially in a country with tens of millions without health insurance. They may have rotten teeth and loads of stress, but hey, they are not dead yet so what's the problem? Sorry that it's all The Guardian but they had a series that I happened to remember, and I think that publication has a good enough reputation: https://www.theguardian.com/society/2017/dec/15/america-extreme-poverty-un-special-rapporteur https://www.theguardian.com/society/2017/dec/15/america-extr... https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/may/21/sequester-cuts-make-america-third-world-country https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/may/21/seques... https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/dec/01/un-extreme-poverty-america-special-rapporteur https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/dec/01/un-extreme-pov... Of course, if we find the slightest mistake or hyperbole (if there even is any) in an article or comment about the plight of the poor we can discuss THAT instead and dismiss the entire thought. Another form of bike-shedding, instead of using good faith for the discussion use every tiny opening of the "opponent" to sidetrack the discussion and to dismiss the issue. So, where are the people of the masses of dying in the streets? None? Even in San Francisco they look shabby but very much still alive? Well, case closed I guess.