5 ms·
They shouldn’t be pissing in a bottle period, they should be taking a break, they are just scared to. No one is forcing them to pee in a bottle.
by matte_black 9y ago
They shouldn’t be pissing in a bottle period, they should be taking a break, they are just scared to. No one is forcing them to pee in a bottle.
- LinuxBender 9y agoOh I totally agree. I'm just suggesting that perhaps this also affects the recipients of the packages.
- matte_black 9y agoYou know how many nasty germs a package comes in contact with even before an Amazon employee touches it and long after it’s shipped? Trillions, with a t.
- LinuxBender 9y agoI don't think that makes it safer to touch the package after peeing in a bottle. Employees are required to wash their hands after using the restroom. I believe that state law may even require it.
- maxerickson 9y agoTrillions of germs, probably not so many nasty ones.
- opencl 9y agoOh sure they're not forcing them to pee in a bottle, they just fire anyone who doesn't hit the performance quotas, which just happen to be barely attainable by somebody who takes no breaks.
- s73v3r_ 9y agoIf your livelihood is going to be taken away because you committed the grave sin of actually going to use the facilities, I would definitely call that force.
- progval 9y ago> No one is forcing them to pee in a bottle. I don't think many people would do that willingly.