4 ms·
I dont care about the "model". I only care about code quality and stability on critical tasks. And currently the distributions are becoming more and more chaoti
by _o_ 8y ago
I dont care about the "model". I only care about code quality and stability on critical tasks. And currently the distributions are becoming more and more chaotic, I think this will bite back, you can try and use some whatever the name paradigms but at the end development is hard and not made only from fun problems to solve, there are lots of annoying and pesky tasks that need to be done. And here the system where everyone is mostly doing what is fun for them has huge disadvantage.
But never mind, time will tell.
- zbentley 8y ago> And here the system where everyone is mostly doing what is fun for them has huge disadvantage. A lot of critical Linux contributors are paid for their work. That's why understanding the model of development is important: they're not doing this for fun, whatever that means.
- anthk 8y agohttps://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=2349257 https://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=2349257
- _o_ 8y agoThank you for this link, really a nice reading.
- BruiseLee 8y agoThe world does not revolve around you. Regardless of your personal preferences, the Linux development model was an important part of its success.
- _o_ 8y agoWith apologism you are only hurting Linux. With criticism you would be helping it, but looks like that the football match mentality is winning at the end. Have a nice PR session, i am quitting, have it your way. You won. How cool, right? Right? ;)