4 ms·
spoiler: has zero to do with quantum entanglement. The author thought that was funny? Cool though
by stevemk14ebr 8y ago
spoiler: has zero to do with quantum entanglement. The author thought that was funny? Cool though
- _bxg1 8y agoDid you really expect it to?
- leetbulb 8y agoSeriously wtf... I'll honestly say that I fell for this click bait. If it said something along the lines of "blah blah... accelerometer" I would've checked it out, too, AND actually read it. But because of the shit click bait, I'm not even going to bother.
- johncoatesdev 8y agoSorry about that. I figured most would get it was a lighthearted reference, and not groundbreaking quantum research that would change the world as we know it. Even so I made the first words after the title be “I might have the definition of “quantum entanglement” wrong.“, to try and make that clear. Oh well, I’ll get it right next time. Thanks for the feedback.
- mikenew 8y agoPersonally I thought it was genuinely funny.
- Quiark 8y agoAnd on top of that, I thought it was in a real blender. So my brain imagined something like "Will it blend" while receiving orientation of all the parts via quantum entanglement. Now that would be the future.