Moore's law was quite an outlier in the history of technology, and one thing that kept it going is that the returns kept up with the cost of the increasingly co

Moore's law was quite an outlier in the history of technology, and one thing that kept it going is that the returns kept up with the cost of the increasingly complex technology that it demanded. The paragraph that dismisses the 'low hanging fruit' explanation of Eroom's law looks rather weak to me - it says there are still many potential targets, but does not consider their technical feasibility, cost or potential ROI.