3 ms·

The debate is mostly happening here: https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/8cdqi8/restore_contract_code_at/ https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/8cd

by dahdum 9y ago

The debate is mostly happening here: https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/8cdqi8/restore_contract_code_at/ https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/8cdqi8/restore_co... This change has no consensus like the DAO fix did, and the problem it fixes is both negligible and self inflicted.

deleted 9y ago
[deleted]
Animats 9y ago
Points made there: 1) The proposed transaction is a dilution. It reduces the value of everyone else's Ether by a payout to Parity. 2) Businesses which use the Etherium system but aren't closely associated with the insiders are at a disadvantage when the insiders can recover from their mistakes, but outsiders cannot.
- 5chdn 9y ago
  Curious why people think so w.r.t. (2). Anyone can submit a proposal.
  - xref 9y ago
    for the reason he said in (2), insiders like Parity have much better odds of having their EIP accepted. but it is your proposal so you knew that.
Tepix 9y ago
If the DAO had consensus, why do we have ETC (Ethereum Classic) now?