4 ms·
> See: inciting riot. The concept of "Inciting a Riot" is one of the more obvious overreaches to control distasteful groups that leads us down the path of thou
by jack9 8y ago
> See: inciting riot.
The concept of "Inciting a Riot" is one of the more obvious overreaches to control distasteful groups that leads us down the path of thought control (vis a vis postmodernism or original economic stratification). If someone is so ignorant or intent that they take an unlawful action due to spoken or written word, they had problems before. The edge cases are something more akin to accomplice. Those "rioter" problems were historically in education/comprehension (ironically something the internet has helped with in many cases) or mental defect or justified outrage. Because capitalistic and social opponents could not affect the changes they wanted or changes fast enough, the idea of a riot was born as a club. Even in america, the right to assemble is curtailed by the judicious application of this opposing legal construct.
- foolrush 8y ago> If someone is so ignorant or intent that they take an unlawful action due to spoken or written word, Speech and words can be loaded with ideological stances. Those can amount to political violence over time, and normalize such against others. Speech and words aren't passive, but rather loaded ideologically and politically. This doesn't begin to decant the fallacy of "unlawful."
- icebraining 8y agoCan you provide the definition of "decant" you're using? I'm having trouble finding one that fits the context.
- foolrush 8y agoEmpty out, drain, etc. The hidden ideological ground that all laws are ethical and just at any given point in history is absurd.
- icebraining 8y agoThe whole point of the previous post is literally that one law (prohibition of "inciting a riot") is unethical, so the claim that they're saying that "all laws are ethical and just" is simply absurd.
- foolrush 8y ago> If someone is so ignorant or intent that they take an unlawful action due to spoken or written word, they had problems before. See 'unlawful', which is difficult to unpack to "some laws" or worse "not all laws", agree? Along these lines, my point was that racism, bigotry, homo/transphobia is a cultural byproduct of an accumulation of speech and text that may be politically violent.